January 27th, 2012 — 6:47am
The Australian media somehow isn’t seeing the true significance of yesterday’s skirmish outside The Lobby restaurant following Tony Abott’s ignorant comments about the significance of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy in Canberra. I unfortunately have no real connections to the Aboriginal community here. But only last year on a cool autumn morning I was walking through the rose gardens, when I caught a whisper of smoke on the air from a campfire burning over in front of old parliament house. It reminded me of the bush, it reminded me of the Australia that exists beyond the monoliths of the parliamentary triangle, that existed on this spot for millenia, and I was immensely grateful for it then.
It is terrible that there can be no recognition among people like Tony Abbott of the importance of the ongoing protest that has been occuring at this spot. It is symbolic of the whole state of affairs that still exists with the role of Aboriginal people in Australia. I thought last Autumn – why don’t Aboriginal people have a permanent home here in Canberra, why do they have to keep on with this temporary place? But perhaps by asking that question I am shewing how out of touch I am with the heart of the issues. Whatever the solution is, I hope that it does not put out the fires that drift their aromatic smoke among the rosebushes on the lawns of parliament. It seems to be the only signature of humane occupation that exists in Canberra.
Comments Off on I love the Aboriginal Tent Embassy | canberra history, inchiki news, indigenous
January 19th, 2012 — 6:49am
It is acknowledged that time travel is possible – in fact, we are going to need to use these kinds of physics if we are ever going to explore the universe, at least according to the framework of general relativity. But the grandfather paradox appears to make this impossible, or at least very difficult to understand. Essentially, the moment we go back in time and change an event which has a consequence for the moment at which we left to go back in time, we enter some kind of self iterating loop which traps us forever in a state of semi-existence. We are very uncomfortable with this notion, as we are used to living within a solid cause-effect event tree. However, mathematicians are quite comfortable with infinite loops and use them all the time. The question seems to be – how would this feel to a human being? Well, i think i have one possible explanation, which is that it would feel exactly like life already feels today, and that the life we lead is just such an infinite loop.
The moment that one initiated an action which altered the past, we would literally fall into a sea of scenarios all of which could exist as a consequence of that act. It would be like striking a mirror with a hammer, each shard of which reflected a possibility that was created by our act of altering the past. Taking the grandfather paradox as an example, if we really did go back in time and kill our grandfather, then we would create a whole lot of futures in which we didn’t exist. However, these would still be balanced by all the futures which already existed where we didn’t kill our grandfather, plus a whole lot of in-between futures where perhaps we just gave our grandfather a slight flesh wound which didn’t alter our existence quite as much but still had some effect. Obviously, conceptually, we have trouble with all this existing at once. We are used to being a single being existing in a single body at a single point in time. But I argue that this is just a fudge, that we are tied for i suppose cognitive reasons to a single thread of history, but that this does not reflect reality at all. The moment we become disconnected is when we die. We then have a chance to pick up another thread. This would also be initiated by the instant we initiated a travel back in time to alter history, because implicit in that moment would be the possibility of our own ‘death’ or, ceasing to exist.
Hopping from one stream to another would become a familiar action to a time traveller. The concepts of ‘birth’ and ‘death’ would become antiquated. Instead, the full mutability of possible life histories would be our terrain. The concept of ‘me’ would shift each time we leapt from one history to another, as each body we inhabited had sprung from a slightly different seed. We would become an actor in our own life, and in the related lives which became revealed by tinkering with the chains of our own history.
image courtesy gavesako blog
As fantastic as this sounds, it is nothing more than what is happening every day of our lives. Perhaps no ‘time travel’ device demonstrably exists in this current thread of space, in this world. However could our consciousness contain the countless visitations of our own self from other time paths? Passing fleeting visits, leaving the sticky threads of other worlds in our mind – these are our thoughts, our imaginings and our dreams. We exist in a web of time, connected by the very laws of physics with countless others – ‘aliens’ maybe – yet they are as familiar to us as our own face reflected in the mirror, they are intimates to our inner ‘private’ world. Maybe one day we will become time travellers ourselves and we will join them – this will be the next great leap in evolution – when we are freed from this time and space and will have the whole multiverse to explore, and all through familiar eyes.
I suppose these kind of ideas would make me certifiable… but it’s all bread and butter to the poetic humour.
Comments Off on Perhaps time travel is happening all the time (so to speak) | essay, whimsy
January 4th, 2012 — 6:49am
Today I have finally finished the first part of my SIN SUM SON trilogy. I’ve drawn on some of my travel experiences from journal days for part one, and it is actually quite autobiographical, except for the parts which obviously aren’t, like the bit where i die. SUM and SON I wrote and posted some time ago, so as this is the last installment, I have brought the three parts together on their own page now.
Comments Off on SIN (School Ist es Nicht) | inchiki news